Malawi: Experts Worried With the Age Bill – Says Laws Should Not Target Individuals

[ad_1]

Private practice lawyer John-Gift Mwakhwawa has advised Parliament against passing legislation that targets individuals as would be the case with the move by Mulanje Central legislator Kondwani Nankhumwa who is set to present a Private Member’s Bill proposing a constitutional amendment to make any person above 80 years of age ineligible to contest for the presidency.

“The real issue is the age at which one can stand for office of President,” he said.

The Business Committee of Parliament, which sets the agenda and comprises leaders of parties represented in Parliament and is chaired by the Speaker, is scheduled to meet tomorrow and will discuss whether to allow the Bill for debate, according to our sources at Parliament.

According to a memorandum of the proposed amendment we has seen, the Bill seeks to amend Section 80 (6)(b) of the Constitution which provides for age eligibility of presidential candidates.

Reads in part the Bill: “Section 80 (6)(b) of the Constitution Act No 20 of 1994 of the laws of Malawi [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Constitution’] is amended by inserting the following new words ‘and is not more than eighty years old’ at the end of Section 80 (6)(b).”

This will be a second attempt after a similar move failed in 2018 when former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator for Nsanje South West Joseph Chidanti-Malunga had proposed that the maximum age for those aspiring for the presidency should be capped at 65.

Currently, Section 80(6) of the Constitution stipulates that a person is eligible for election as President or Vice-President if he or she is a citizen of Malawi by birth or descent and has attained the minimum age of 35, but there is no maximum age cap.

Nankhumwa argues that given the demands of the offices of the President, First Vice-President and/or Second Vice-President, there is need for energetic office holders who can be productive and be able to steer State and government business in the right direction.

Reads the memorandum to the proposed Bill: “It is my considered view; the framers of the Constitution might have inadvertently and or deliberately overlooked this aspect when drafting the foregoing provision.”

When contacted on the matter, Nankhumwa was non-committal and said Parliament was better- placed to speak.

Parliament spokesperson Ian Mwenye could also neither confirm nor deny the matter, asking that the Business Committee meet first.

He said: “Let’s wait for the Business Committee to meet. It’s only after that meeting that we will know which business is coming before the House.”